Identifying interested parties (ISO 9001 clause 4.2) with an example
Interested parties are parties that have an influence on your organisation, or that are affected by what you do. Clause 4.2 of ISO 9001 requires you to determine which interested parties are relevant to your quality management system and which requirements they set. You do this together with the context analysis (4.1), and the result feeds into your risk management. Below you will find a worked interested parties analysis that you can adopt. The full text of the standard is in NEN-EN-ISO 9001:2026 .
Short answer: make a table listing, for each interested party, their relevant requirements and expectations, whether each one is a hard requirement (law or contract) or a wish, and how you address it in your system. Update the table at least once a year in the management review.
On this page
The requirements of the standard, including the 2026 version.
What does 4.2 require?A completed table for an SME.
Example analysisPlotting influence against interest.
PrioritisingThe evidence for clause 4.2.
What the auditor wants to seeWhat does ISO 9001 clause 4.2 require?
The core of clause 4.2 is short. You determine which interested parties are relevant to your quality management system and which of their requirements are relevant. After that, you keep this information up to date and review it. Two additions have come in over the last few years:
| Part | Since | What you do with it |
|---|---|---|
| Determine the relevant interested parties | 2015 | A list of parties that matter for quality |
| Determine their relevant requirements | 2015 | For each party: what do they expect from you? |
| Monitor and review this information | 2015 | Update it annually and after major changes |
| Consider requirements on climate change | Amendment 2024 | Interested parties may have requirements on climate, for example a customer who asks for CO2 figures |
| Determine which requirements you address through the system | ISO 9001:2026 | Record for each requirement whether you include it in your system |
The last step is a clarification. You do not have to meet every wish. Legal requirements and what you agree with customers always belong on the list.
Clause 4.2 does not require a separate document. Even so, a table is by far the easiest way to show that you have thought about it. Without a record, you have to explain everything to the auditor verbally.
Example interested parties analysis for ISO 9001
This is the analysis of a fictitious wholesaler in technical parts with 25 employees. The “Type” column shows whether a requirement is hard (law or contract) or soft (expectation). The last column shows where you can find it in your system.
| Interested party | Relevant requirements and expectations | Type | Include in QMS? | How we secure it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business customers | Correct parts, delivery within 24 hours, traceability | Contract | Yes | Order process, delivery reliability KPI |
| Large customer (framework contract) | Report CO2 emissions of transport | Contract | Yes | Annual report, transport objective |
| Employees | Clear work instructions, training, safe work | Wish and law | Yes | Competence matrix, work instructions |
| Suppliers | Clear orders, payment within agreed terms | Contract | Yes | Purchasing process, supplier evaluation |
| Owner | Profitability, continuity | Wish | Partly | Management review, annual plan |
| Government | Compliance with legislation, for example product safety and the Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming (AVG, General Data Protection Regulation) | Law | Yes | Legal register, privacy policy |
| Certification body | Meeting ISO 9001 | Contract | Yes | Internal audit, management review |
| Neighbours on the business park | No nuisance from lorry traffic at night | Wish | No | Outside the QMS, handled by facilities |
Look at the last line. You may name an interested party and still decide that the requirement does not belong in your quality system. In that case, briefly record why.
Prioritising interested parties by influence and interest
For a long list, a simple split on two axes helps. How much influence does the party have over your quality, and how much interest do they have in your results? This is also called a stakeholder matrix.
| Little interest | High interest | |
|---|---|---|
| High influence | Keep satisfied (for example a regulator) | Involve closely (for example your largest customer) |
| Low influence | Monitor (for example a trade magazine) | Inform (for example employees of a supplier) |
The standard does not require this matrix. It is, however, a quick way to decide which requirements to address first and how often you have contact.
Identifying interested parties in four steps
- Brainstorm the list. Think broadly: customers, end users, employees, temporary agency workers, suppliers, subcontractors, owners, banks, government, trade associations and the certification body.
- Remove what is not relevant. Relevant means the party affects your ability to deliver good products, or is affected by that ability.
- Fill in the requirements. Take them from contracts, legislation, customer satisfaction research and conversations. Use your customer satisfaction measurement as a source.
- Decide what you address. For each requirement, note in the table whether you include it in your system and where.
What does the auditor want to see for interested parties?
| What the auditor asks | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Who are your relevant interested parties? | The table or a comparable overview |
| How do you know what they want? | Contracts, customer research, legislation, consultation |
| Has climate change been considered? | A line or explanation on climate-related requirements |
| How do you turn this into actions? | Link with risks, objectives and processes |
| Is it up to date? | Discussed at the most recent management review |
A common finding is that the list names customers but misses their requirements. “Customers: satisfaction” is too vague. “Customers: delivery within 24 hours, error-free invoices” can be tested.
Common mistakes with interested parties under ISO 9001
- Naming only customers. Employees, suppliers and government are then missing.
- No requirements, only names. The standard asks about their requirements, not only who they are.
- No link with the rest. A requirement that does not come back in your processes or objectives is a loose end.
- Made once. A new large customer or a new law should lead to an update.
What is the difference between interested parties (4.2) and the context analysis (4.1)?
The context analysis is about issues: developments inside and outside your business, such as staff shortages or new legislation. Interested parties are about parties and what they expect from you. The two are connected. A new law is an external issue under 4.1, and the government that expects compliance is an interested party under 4.2.
Many companies combine both in one document. That is allowed, as long as it is clear which parties you have identified and which requirements they set.
Next step
Use the requirements of your interested parties when you determine risks and opportunities, and translate the most important ones into quality objectives. Want to check whether chapter 4 is complete? Use the ISO 9001 checklist. Are you also doing ISO 14001? Clause 4.2 there has the same structure. See the requirements of ISO 14001.
Sources
- NEN-EN-ISO 9001:2026 , clause 4.2
- NEN-EN-ISO 9001:2015
- ISO.org - ISO 9001