PDCA cycle: how plan-do-check-act works in ISO standards
The PDCA cycle is a four-step model for improvement: plan (decide what you want to achieve and how), do (carry it out), check (measure whether it works) and act (adjust and secure what works). Every ISO management system standard is built around this cycle. ISO 9001:2015 explicitly mentions the model in clause 0.3.2. It states that you can apply it to every process and to the management system as a whole.
For certification, that means the auditor does not check whether you use the word PDCA. They check whether your cycle is closed. Do you have objectives (plan), and do you carry them out (do)? Do you measure them in internal audits and KPIs (check), and do you take decisions in the management review (act)? ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 also describe PDCA in their introductions (clause 0.4).
What do plan, do, check and act mean?
Below, for each phase, is what you do and what evidence an auditor expects. Use the last column as a checklist for your own system.
| Phase | What you do | Typical evidence for the auditor |
|---|---|---|
| Plan | Set objectives, determine risks and opportunities, choose the approach and resources | Objectives, risk register, planning |
| Do | Carry out as planned, train people, record the work | Work instructions, records, training certificates |
| Check | Measure and compare against the objective | KPI report, internal audit report, complaints overview |
| Act | Adjust: correct, improve, set new objectives | Action list, management review minutes, revised procedures |
The cycle does not stop after act. What you decide in act is the input for the next plan. That is why many people draw PDCA as a wheel rolling up a slope: with every round, you climb a little higher.
Is the PDCA cycle mandatory for ISO certification?
No, not as a separate requirement. No ISO standard asks for a document titled “PDCA”. The cycle is built into the requirements themselves, however. Setting objectives (clause 6), measuring and auditing (clause 9) and improving (clause 10) are all mandatory.
If you miss one of those steps, you receive a nonconformity against that specific requirement. For example, no management review means a nonconformity against clause 9.3, not a nonconformity against “PDCA”.
Where does the PDCA cycle come from?
The model goes back to the American statistician Walter Shewhart. W. Edwards Deming made it known from the 1950s onwards, mainly in Japan. That is why it is also called the Deming cycle. Deming later preferred “study” to “check” (PDSA), because in that phase you need to learn, not just tick things off.
For ISO certification, it does not matter whether you say PDCA or PDSA. The standards use PDCA.
PDCA and the clauses of the HLS
All modern ISO standards follow the same High Level Structure (HLS), with clauses 4 to 10. ISO 9001 shows in a figure how those clauses fall into the cycle. A common breakdown looks like this:
| HLS clause | Topic | PDCA phase |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Context | Interested parties, scope, processes | Basis for the cycle |
| 5 Leadership | Policy, roles, top management involvement | The heart of the cycle |
| 6 Planning | Risks and opportunities, objectives | Plan |
| 7 Support | People, resources, competence, documents | Plan and do |
| 8 Operation | The operational processes themselves | Do |
| 9 Evaluation | Measurement, internal audit, management review | Check |
| 10 Improvement | Nonconformities, corrective actions, continual improvement | Act |
This is useful at audit time. If the auditor asks “how do you adjust course?”, the answer is in clause 10: your nonconformities and corrective actions.
Example: applying the PDCA cycle to a quality objective
An installation company with 25 employees receives complaints about fitters arriving late. This is what one round of PDCA looks like. You can take this table directly as a template.
| Phase | Question | Completed example |
|---|---|---|
| Plan | What is the problem and the objective? | 18% of appointments start more than 30 minutes late. Target: below 8% within six months. |
| Plan | What is the cause? | The planning does not account for travel time between jobs (root cause analysis). |
| Plan | Which measure, who and when? | The planner includes travel time via the route planner. Owner: head of planning. Start 1 March. |
| Do | How do you carry it out? | Trial with two teams over eight weeks. The planner receives a short instruction. |
| Check | What do the figures show? | Late starts in the trial teams: 7%. In the other teams: 17%. Complaints about waiting halved. |
| Act | What do you secure, and what do you adjust? | The way of working is included in the planning procedure and rolled out to all teams. New target for next year: below 5%. |
This example shows three things an auditor wants to see: a measurable objective, figures before and after, and a decision that is recorded. Want to formulate your objectives well? Read quality objectives for ISO 9001.
You do not need to keep PDCA as a separate form. If your objectives, measurements, audit reports and management review connect with each other, you already have the cycle. The auditor follows that thread.
At which levels do you use PDCA in your management system?
PDCA works at three levels at once. That explains why the word appears in so many standard texts.
| Level | Plan | Do | Check | Act |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The whole system (annual cycle) | Policy and annual objectives | Processes run | Internal audit, KPIs | Management review |
| One process | Process description and standard | Carry out the work | Process indicator | Adjust the process |
| One problem | Cause and measure | Implement the measure | Test effectiveness | Secure it or repeat |
At the lowest level, PDCA looks a lot like an 8D report. That is also a PDCA cycle, just worked out in eight steps for one complaint or problem.
What does the auditor ask about the PDCA cycle?
Auditors rarely ask “do you do PDCA?”. They test whether the cycle closes. Typical questions are:
- “What objectives do you have this year, and how are they doing?”
- “What did you do with the findings from the previous internal audit?”
- “Which decision from the management review has since been carried out?”
- “How do you know this corrective action worked?”
The last question is the hardest. Many organisations stop after do. They introduce a measure, but do not check whether the problem stays away afterwards. Then the check is missing, and an auditor can write a minor nonconformity on the effectiveness of corrective actions.
Common mistakes with the PDCA cycle
- Plan without a measurement point. “Improve customer satisfaction” is not a plan. Without a number, you cannot compare anything in the check phase.
- Check without act. The KPIs sit in a dashboard, but nobody takes a decision when they turn red.
- Act without securing it. The improvement works, but it is not written into any procedure or instruction. A year later, everyone has forgotten it.
- One round per year. The annual cycle is mandatory, but for problems you do not wait for the management review.
PDCA cycle per standard
The cycle is the same everywhere, but the content differs per standard. With ISO 14001 it is about environmental objectives. With ISO 45001 it is about hazards and risks, and with ISO 27001 about information security risks. With ISO 50001, the energy review forms the plan phase.
Further reading
- Risk management under ISO 9001 - the plan phase worked out in detail
- Management review - the act phase at system level
- Root cause analysis and 5 whys - finding the cause before you make a plan
- NEN (Royal Netherlands Standardisation Institute) on ISO 9001 - the official standard text